I,
Claudius, a 13-episode serial produced by BBC/London Film Productions
and first aired on BBC-2 in 1976, made its American debut on the
Public Broadcasting Service in November 1977 as an installment of
Masterpiece Theatre, sponsored by Mobil Corporation. The
production was based on two novels by poet and essayist Robert Graves,
I, Claudius: From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius, Born
B.C. X, Murdered and Diefied A.D. LIV (1934), and Claudius
the God and His Wife Messalina (1935). Adapted for television
by Jack Pulman, I, Claudius chronicles the slide of Roman civilization
in the first century A.D. into unrelenting depravity during the
reigns of the four Emperors who succeeded Julius Caesar--Augustus,
Tiberius, Caligula, and Claudius. Its themes of decadence, which
included brutal assassinations, sadistic gladitorial contests, incest,
forced prostitution, adultery, nymphomania, and homosexuality, and
its scenes of nudity and orgiastic violence, including a gruesome
abortion, while toned down somewhat from the BBC original, nevertheless
pushed the limits of moral acceptability on American television
at the time.
Anchored
firmly in the genre of fictional history, I, Claudius portrayed
real historical figures and events, but, according to Woodward,
"with the license of the novelist to imagine and invent." While
Graves drew extensively from Claudius's biographer Suetonius, among
others, for the historical material in the novels, he framed the
story by using Claudius himself as the autobiographical narrator
of his 13-year reign as Emperor and the reigns of his three predecessors.
At the outset of the drama, Claudius is seen as a lonely old man
perusing various incriminating documents from which he is constructing
his "history." His project was prophesied by the Cumaen sibyl many
years earlier when Claudius visited her and was told to write the
work, seal and bury it where no one will find it. Then, according
to the sibyl, "1900 years from now and not before, Claudius shall
speak." The remainder of the serial is backstory, recounting the
unbridled ambition, domestic intrigue, bloodlust and sexual dysfunction
of Rome's ruling elite.
Claudius
is among the most fascinating dramatis personae of Roman history.
A weak and sickly youth, repressed by a stern tutor as a child,
physically deformed and suffering from a severe stammer, he was
an outsider in the royal family, considered an idiot and, as Kiefer
puts it, "utterly unsuited for all the duties expected of him as
a young prince." As an adult, he was never taken seriously as a
future ruler of Rome. Ironically, however, Claudius was ostensibly
the most intelligent of the lot. A shy man of considerable culture
inclined toward a life of quiet scholarship, he knew Greek well,
and wrote several works on history (now lost), including two on
the Etruscans and the Carthaginians. In the Imperial Rome of his
day, however, obsessed with the exercise of power through treachery
and brute force, such preoccupations of the mind were considered
little more than idle pastimes.
While Claudius was wise in matters of history, he was apparently
far less so in matters requiring discernment of human character.
His repression as a child led to his weak reliance on other people
as an adult, especially the ruthless women in the Imperial family.
Nevertheless, Claudius was not the "complete idiot." He was consul
under Caligula; and when chosen by the soldiers to be Emperor, following
Caligula's murder, he demonstrated many excellent administrative
qualities. He annexed Mauretania, and in A.D. 43 he landed in Britain,
which he made a Roman province. During his reign the kingdoms of
Judea and Thrace were reabsorbed into the empire.
The
character of Claudius (played with great intelligence and wit by
Derek Jacobi) is clearly the linchpin that provides dramaturgical
continuity throughout the serial, as both historical actor and observer/commentator.
If one were to assume for a moment that I, Claudius is history
(which it is not), a professional historian would question Claudius's
motivation for presenting his "history" as he has done here. Self-interest
might be a driving force for portraying himself in the best possible
light given the less-than-sanguine historical epoch in which he
assumed a major role.
In fact, I, Claudius does precisely that. Claudius is the
much misunderstood and frequently mocked "good guy"--the "holy fool"--amidst
a rogue's gallery of psychopaths, most notably Livia (played to
fiendish perfection by Sian Phillips), the scheming wife of Augustus,
and Claudius's grandmother, who methodically poisons all possible
candidates who might assume the emperor's throne over her weak son
Tiberius upon Augustus's death; and the ghoulish and crazed Caligula
(played by John Hurt, whose memorably hyperbolic performance might
be classified as a caricature if the subject were anyone but Caligula).
Set against the likes of such characters, Claudius comes off looking
like a Saint. But was he in reality?
While
reviewers generally accepted the presentation as accurate, the actual
biography seems quite different. Suetonius's treatment of Claudius
which, while questioned by some modern scholars as likely exaggerated
in some details, is nevertheless accepted in large measure as an
accurate reflection of the man. According to Suetonius, Claudius
"overstepped the legal penalty for serious frauds by sentencing
such criminals to fight with wild beasts." He "directed that examination
by torture and executions for high treason should take place in
full before his eyes . . . . At every gladiatorial game given by
himself or another, he ordered even those fighters who had fallen
by accident . . . to have their throats cut so that he could watch
their faces as they died." This sadistic streak in Claudius, which
Suetonius also notes in other passages, is absent from the BBC serial,
and for good reason, for it would make the character far less sympathetic
and thereby subvert the melodramatic "good vs. evil" contrast established
throughout.
In
another area, that of sexuality, the historical record again comes
into conflict with the fictional treatment. According to Suetonius,
Claudius's "passion for women was immoderate." In the television
version, Claudius is clearly portrayed more as a hapless victim
of duplicitous women (and a staunch protector of virtuous women)
than as a lecher.
The historical record does, however, include the positive side of
Claudius's character so much in evidence in the BBC presentation.
He often appears as "a gentle and amiable man," as when he published
a decree that sick and abandoned slaves should have their freedom
and that the killing of such a slave should count as murder.
Claudius
was a man grounded in his cultural milieu. His sadism, while tempered
by erudition and amiability, should nonetheless be acknowledged.
At the same time, his behavior can properly be contextualized by
noting that that not only in Imperial Rome, but also in the Republic
preceding it (which Claudius held in high regard), criminals, when
condemned to death, were routinely taken to the amphitheater to
be torn to pieces by wild beasts as a public show.
The historical character Claudius is a complex man full of contradictions,
and, one could reasonably argue, dramatically more resonant than
the sanitized Emperor offered viewers of I, Claudius. The
BBC production is, nevertheless, excellent entertainment featuring
superb ensemble acting and expert direction by Herbert Wise. Its
treatment of deviant behavior is sensitive, seeking to avoid the
titillation evidenced in so much of today's violent Hollywood fare.
Its scenes of debauchery and carnage seem safely distanced (by two-thousand
years) from our present milieu, and may even allow us to feel good
that the contemporary world seems less debased by comparison, if
we bracket out such collective barbarity as Nazi and Khmer Rouge
genocide. But the nagging issue of historical veracity remains.
The
problem is that I, Claudius is symptomatic of a general tendency
to fictionalize history in popular media, from which the broad public,
as Woodward rightly points out, "mainly receives whatever conceptions,
impressions, fantasies, and delusions it may entertain about the
past." As a consequence, not only may the general populace internalize
a distorted picture of historical persons and events, but also be
deprived of the invaluable opportunity to better understand its
collective past and apply that knowledge critically and constructively
to the present. People today, in the thrall of the media popularizers
of history, are less likely than their forebears to read the work
of professional historians, whose scholarly ethics require them
to "disappoint" those among the laity or designing politicians who
would "improve, sanitize, gentrify, idealize, or sanctify the past;
or, on the other hand . . . discredit, denigrate, or even blot out
portions of it." Thus is left open the door to the demagoguery of
self-interested revisionist history.
Predictably,
discussion of I, Claudius in the popular press prior to its
American television debut focused not on such questions of historical
veracity, but rather on how American audiences might react to its
presentation of sex and violence. As Brown noted, the serial "is
a chancy venture for American public television and one that got
on the national service . . .on sheer merit." Mobil Corporation,
the Masterpiece Theatre sponsor, was informed by WGBH-TV, the Boston
public station who puts together the Masterpiece Theatre package,
that some scenes might cause audience discomfort. Mobil responded
that it had no reservations about the program and felt I, Claudius
to be television of "extraordinary quality." Nonetheless, WGBH did
make selective edits for the American version without prompting
by Mobil. These included shortening a scene featuring bare-breasted
dancers, and eliminating what might be considered a blasphemous
comment by a Roman soldier on the Virgin Birth, some gory footage
of an infant being stabbed to death, and bedroom shots featuring
naked bodies making love. WGBH defended these and other excisions
by arguing that viewers in some parts of the United States would
be disturbed by their inclusion.
I, Claudius became one of the more critically acclaimed Masterpiece
Theatre offerings and attracted a loyal following, which today can
revisit the fictionalized life and times of Emperor Tiberius Claudius
Drusus Nero Germanicus, a.k.a. Claudius I, on the cable arts network
Bravo.
-Hal
Himmelstein
Brown,
Les. "TV's I, Claudius Will Test the Boundaries of Public
Broadcasting." New York Times, 6 November 1977.
Graves,
Robert. Claudius the God and His Wife Messalina. New York:
Vintage Books, 1935.
_______________.
I, Claudius: From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius, Born B.C.
X, Murdered and Diefied A.D. LIV. New York: Vintage Books, 1934.
Kiefer,
Otto. Sexual Life in Ancient Rome. New York: Dorset Press,
1993.
O'Connor,
John J. "TV: Tour of Rome With I, Claudius." New York Times,
3 November 1977.
Woodward,
C. Vann. The Future of the Past. New York: Oxford University
Press, 1989.