Kenyan
television is a classic example of an industry whose good chances
for development have been consistently frustrated by government
sensitivity and political interference. The medium's 30-year history
in Kenya is marked by stunted growth due to excessive government
regulation, and extensive abuse by the dominant political forces.
In
1959 the Kenya Broadcasting Corporation was established by the British
colonial administration with the objective of providing radio and
television broadcasting. The proposal for the formation of a public
corporation had been submitted by a commission appointed earlier
in the year to report on the advantages and disadvantages of a television
service for Kenya, and the impact of such a service on radio broadcasting.
The 1959 Proud Commission rejected earlier findings by another commission
in 1954 that television was "economically impracticable in Kenya"
and concluded that the new medium was likely to be financially self-reliant
if it was set up as a fully-fledged commercial outfit.
Between
1959 and 1961, and in keeping with the Proud Commission's recommendations,
the colonial administration contracted a consortium of eight companies
to build and operate a television service. The eight firms, seven
of which were from Europe and North America, formed Television Network
Ltd. which was charged with the responsibility of setting up the
national television broadcasting system. The consortium, cognizant
of the irreversible developments towards Kenya's political independence,
created the Kenya Broadcasting Corporation as an autonomous public
organization. The idea was to have the corporation wield as much
independence as the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). By the
end of 1962, a transmission station and recording studio had been
set up, and television was officially launched the following year.
The
corporation created by the consortium bore a striking semblance
with the BBC. It drew its revenue from advertising, annual license
fees on receiver sets, and government subventions. The vision of
financially self-sustaining television service was however misplaced,
especially since the new medium failed to attract as much advertising
as the older and more popular radio broadcasting service. Within
the first full financial year of television broadcasting--July 1963
to June 1964--the corporation posted a loss of nearly $1 million,
and had to resort to government loans and supplementary appropriations
to remain afloat. Coincidentally, Kenya had gained independence
and the new government, worried about the threat to national sovereignty
posed by the foreign ownership of the broadcasting apparatus, decided
to nationalize the corporation in June 1964. After the takeover,
the corporation was renamed Voice of Kenya (VoK) and was converted
to a department under the Ministry of Information, Broadcasting
and Tourism (later renamed Ministry of Information and Broadcasting).
Its new role, as the government mouthpiece, was to provide information,
education and entertainment. And while the government adopted a
capitalist approach to economic development which embraced private
sector participation in all areas of the economy and even welcomed
participation in a number of electronic broadcasting activities,
private ownership of broadcasting concerns was disallowed.
Between
1964 and 1990, television and radio were owned and controlled by
the state, and the two media exercised great caution in reporting
politically-sensitive news. During this period, several attempts
were made to move away from the broadcasting system set up. The
Ministry of Information and Broadcasting replaced annual license
fees with a one-time permit fee, and the drive for commercial self-sustenance
was replaced by a politically-inspired initiative for increased
local content and a sharper nationalistic outlook. The objective
was elusive, however, as the VoK television was only able to achieve
a 40% local programming content by the mid-1980s against the target
of 70% local content. Television also failed to become an authoritative
national medium: studies in 1985 showed that only 17% of electronic
media audience regarded television as the best source of information,
compared to 86% who rated radio as their prime news source.
Several reasons were advanced for poor performance of television.
Besides being a preserve of the educated minority in the country,
the spread of ownership of television sets was severely curtailed
by the poor penetration of the national electrical power grid. Even
worse is the poor transmission the country received from the 55
small transmission and booster stations, whose weak signals generally
cover small areas or are constrained by the country's rugged topography.
As such, household audiences have been growing mainly within the
major urban areas, or near large rural centers served by electricity
and near a booster station.
In
1989, the VoK was renamed Kenya Broadcasting Corporation and accorded
semi-autonomous status founded on the premise that it would adopt
a more commercial-oriented stance. Although the corporation unveiled
grandiose plans to expand news coverage and improve local programming
content, it was unable to chart out an independent editorial position,
and is still widely seen as a part of the government propaganda
machinery. Some progress has however been made in increased weekly
on-air periods, and enhancement of color transmission. Until the
early 1990s, the corporation relied on cheap but time-consuming
air-mail services for the supply of foreign news footage even though
the country was serviced by Intelsat. Since
1994, the corporation has been re-transmitting large chunks of the
BBC World Service Television several nights per week.
Since
March 1990, a second television station, the Kenya Television Network
(KTN) has been in operation, offering a mixture of relayed re-transmission
of the American Cable News Network (CNN) programming and light entertainment.
Transmitting on UHF channel, KTN started out as a pilot project
for a 24-hour subscriber TV service in Nairobi and its environs,
but has apparently abandoned plans to scramble its signal and currently
derives most of its revenue from advertising and TV production services.
Also, it was initiated as a joint venture between Kenya's ruling
party, Kanu, and the London-based Maxwell Communications, but the
British media group withdrew after the death of its founder, Robert
Maxwell.
In
spite of its private ownership position, KTN has been unable to
provide independent news coverage because of excessive political
interference with its editorial direction, a problem that forced
its management to scrap the transmission of local news for over
one year between 1993 and 1994. About 95% of the station's programs
are foreign, mainly because most of its 24-hour service is a re-transmission
of the CNN signal. A second private station, Cable Television Network
(CTN), launched in March 1994 has also failed to inspire major changes
in Kenya's television industry. CTN has been trying to build a subscriber
base in Nairobi via overhead cables passed along existing electrical
power pylons. Its intermittent transmissions have so far comprised
Indian drama and films. A third private station, Stellavision, was
licensed in the early 1990s but had yet to start broadcasting by
1996.
The
licensing of three private stations, however, says little about
Kenya's commitment to liberalizing the airwaves. In spite of heavy
pressure from a number of interested investors, the Ministry of
Information and Broadcasting has declined to license more stations
on the grounds that broadcasting frequencies are inadequate, and
on a declared fear of losing its authoritarian control over the
information dissemination process. Although about two dozen applications
for new radio and television licenses were submitted between 1985
and 1995, the government has stubbornly refused to allow full private
sector participation in the industry, and instead used heavy-handed
tactics to regulate electronic news flows. For example, even though
KTN receives the CNN signal clearly, it opts for delayed transmission,
hoping to sieve out anything which could be unpalatable to the government.
Due
to the centralized nature of Kenyan television, only a handful of
small production houses have been set up in the country. Most local
productions are from the KBC teams and the government camera crew
located in provincial headquarters. Virtually all programs are either
in English or Swahili; English is the programming language in two
thirds of total air time. Most of the small production houses concentrate
on commercials and documentary filming.
-Nixon
Kariithi
Bourgault, Louise Mahon. Mass Media in sub-Saharan Africa.
Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1995.
Hachten,
William A. Mass Communication in Africa: An Annotated Bibliography.
Madison, Wisconsin: Center for International Communication Studies,
The University of Wisconsin, 1971.
Mwaura,
Peter. Communication Policies in Kenya. Paris: UNESCO, 1980.
Mytton,
Graham. Mass Communication in Africa. London: Edward Arnold,
1983.
Wilcox,
Dennis L. Mass Media in Black Africa: Philosophy and Control.
New York: Praeger, 1975.